Frank, Juengel & Radefeld, Attorneys at Law
Local: 314-282-8657
Toll Free: 800-748-2105

Some considerations relevant to electronic monitoring

Advocates of so-called electronic monitoring for defendants and criminal suspects (and there are many, including, sometimes, criminal defense attorneys) can run through a checklist of reasons why ankle monitors are salutary and beneficial to all involved parties.

For starters, proponents stress, they provide for cheaper monitoring enforcement than is the case when an individual remains locked up in a jail or other detention facility. They reduce the incessant pressures relevant to the overcrowding of incarcerated prisoners. They are more conducive to civil liberty; a common upside cited for electronic monitoring is a bracelet's enabling function allowing an individual "to live at home and move about more freely than they would behind bars."

Two commentators addressing that subject in a recent article for Wired magazine don't buy the accolades. Rather, their in-depth probe of electronic monitoring concludes that the enforcement tool's upside is questionable at best and rife with material downsides.

In fact, assert authors and researchers James Kilgore and Emmett Sanders, an ankle monitor is nothing more than a "high-tech tether" with attached rules that "are far more restrictive than most people realize." Their jointly penned Wired piece questions many bracelet-linked assumptions and strongly stresses that their primary purpose as "digital prisons" raises a host of troubling questions concerning constitutional safeguards, reasonable privacy expectations and additional matters.

One thing is certain concerning the monitors, namely this: their use is definitely on the upswing. The research group Pew Charitable Trusts reports that police agencies increased their use of monitors more than twofold over a recent decade, and that the bracelets' popularity among law enforcers is only increasing.

Kilgore and Sanders say that Americans should be concerned about that. We'll explore their stated concerns in our next blog post.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
AV Preeminent The National Trial Lawyers Super Lawyers Top 50 Avvo Rating Avvo Rating 10
The Bar Association Of Metropolitan St Louis Illinois State Bar Association St Louis Business Journal National Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers The Missouri Bar
St Louis County Bar Association Up Coming Missouri Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers Super Lawyers | Matthew Alan Radefeld | 10 years Super Lawyers | Daniel A. Juengel | 5 years
Contact us for a consultation

Ready To Protect Your Rights

We invite you to make an appointment with us to discuss your legal needs. You can reach us online or by calling us at 314-282-8657.

We provide representation in Missouri, Illinois and federal courts across the nation. Lawyers from around the country refer clients to us, knowing we will deliver the superior level of representation to their clients they would expect from themselves.

Receive the trusted counsel you deserve. Contact us for a consultation.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

7710 Carondelet Avenue
Suite 350
St. Louis, MO 63105

Toll Free: 800-748-2105
Phone: 314-282-8657
St. Louis Law Office Map