Frank, Juengel & Radefeld, Attorneys at Law Frank, Juengel & Radefeld, Attorneys at Law DEFENDING THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED 314-282-8657 Menu View Our Practice Areas

Federal crimes: Mandatory minimum sentencing far from consistent

"Drug kingpins -- I haven't seen one yet."

That remark comes courtesy of a federal judge seeking to make a less than salutary point about the effects of mandatory minimum sentencing outcomes in cases involving federal crimes.

Mandatory minimums surfaced in 1986 pursuant to legislation passed by Congress fueled by the fervor of many Americans in the so-called "War on Crime" to incarcerate drug offenders across the country, including in Missouri, for longer periods.

The law's intent, as stated in a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, was "to target drug kingpins and serious career drug traffickers."

It hasn’t exactly worked out that way. In fact, prison populations across the country have become filled to excess capacity in the years following the law by low-level offenders. Many of them are first-time nonviolent inmates who were sentenced to lengthy terms for what many people --- including a number of judges -- think are relatively trivial offenses.

One judge refers to the often-imprisoned group bearing the brunt of the mandatory minimum policy as “low-hanging fruit.”

A number of commentators on criminal law have noted the tremendous power and discretion that federal prosecutors wield in sentencing outcomes. Articles on mandatory minimums, including the Los Angeles Times piece, also note with regularity that those outcomes can be highly disparate, with defendants similarly charged receiving materially differentiated sentences.

U.S. District Court Judge Mark W. Bennett, a prominent critic of mandatory sentencing, says that prosecutors exercise their power with “jaw-dropping, shocking disparity.”

Increasingly more Americans seem inclined to agree. United States Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. recently instructed federal prosecutors to pull back on mandatory minimum recommendations in cases involving lower-level offenders.

Source: Los Angeles Times, "Use of tough federal sentencing laws varies widely," Joseph Tanfani, Nov. 3, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Our Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Frank, Juengel & Radefeld,
Attorneys at Law

7710 Carondelet Avenue
Suite 350
St. Louis, MO 63105

Phone: 314-282-8657
Fax: 314-721-4377

View Map and Directions

FindLaw Network
Super Lawyers AV Lexis Nexis Martindale Hubbell PeerReviewRated The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers The Bar Association of MetroPolitan St. Louis Illinois State Bar Association St. Louis Business Journal
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers The Missouri Bar St. Louis County Bar Association MACDL UP COMING 2011 Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Back to Top